Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY=EBAutO-wLZx0zkyJgGJk_ZivMWbpMMC4wv1VCnnk3w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
Responses Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
> This patch fixes a few portions on which sepgsql didn't follow the latest
> core API changes.
>
> 1) Even though the prototype of ProcessUtility_hook was recently changed,
> sepgsql side didn't follow this update, so it made build failed.
>
> 2) sepgsql internally uses GETSTRUCT() and HeapTupleGetOid() macro
> these were moved to htup_details.h, so it needs an additional #include
> for "access/htup_defails.h".
>
> 3) sepgsql internally used a bool typed variable named "abort".
> I noticed it conflicts with ereport macro because it internally expanded to
> ereport_domain that contains invocation of "abort()". So, it renamed this
> variables to abort_on_violation.
>
> #define ereport_domain(elevel, domain, rest)    \
>     (errstart(elevel, __FILE__, __LINE__, PG_FUNCNAME_MACRO, domain) ? \
>      (errfinish rest) : (void) 0),                                     \
>         ((elevel) >= ERROR ? abort() : (void) 0)
>
> This does not affect to v9.2, so please apply it on the master branch.

I have committed this untested.  It seems pretty mechanical and I
assume that you tested it.  Anyway, it's certainly broken without the
patch.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: plperl sigfpe reset can crash the server
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade diffs on WIndows