Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Acceptance Tests against a browser (WIP) - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Acceptance Tests against a browser (WIP)
Date
Msg-id CA+OCxozt9evQcAtsLhRvO0xYL7QKr6Gk=RMUzTJ_w0HfFYtVww@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Acceptance Tests against a browser (WIP)  (Atira Odhner <aodhner@pivotal.io>)
Responses Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Acceptance Tests against a browser (WIP)
List pgadmin-hackers
Hi

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Atira Odhner <aodhner@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Here is a new patch which includes the following:
> - randomized ports
> - delete the acceptance_test_db database in setup in case a prior run failed
> - fixed size browser window

Definitely getting there :-). A couple of thoughts/questions:

- Now there are 2 tests in there, it's clear that both the Python
server and browser session are restarted for each test. Can this be
avoided? It'll really slow down test execution as more and more are
added.

- We've got a new monster name:

pgadmin.acceptance.tests.sql_template_selection_by_postgres_version_works_feature_test.SQLTemplateSelectionByPostgresVersionWorksFeatureTest
(which on disk is
sql_template_select_by_postgres_version_works_feature_test.py). Names
like that really must be shortened to something more sane and
manageable.

- I'm a little confused by why the tests cannot be run in server mode.
The error says it's because the username/password is unknown -
however, both the pgAdmin and database server usernames and passwords
are in test_config.json.

Thanks!

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Murtuza Zabuawala
Date:
Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin4][PATCH] To handle "char" type in column node
Next
From: Murtuza Zabuawala
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin4][PATCH] To fix graphical explain for Insert/Update/Delete quries