> Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> > On 9/4/2015 2:04 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> >>> One thing I imagine we could do is to change the signature of >> >>> summrize_range() to also include heapNumBlks which its (only) caller >> >>> brinsummarize() already computes. It will look like: >> >>> >> >>> static void summarize_range(IndexInfo *indexInfo, BrinBuildState *state, >> >>> Relation heapRel, >> >>> BlockNumber heapBlk, >> >>> BlockNumber heapNumBlks); >> >>> >> >>> I'd think changing summarize_range()'s signature would be relatively >> >>> easier/safer. >> >> >> >> Yeah, sounds good. >> > >> > Here's a patch to do that. >> >> Thanks. It looks good to me (and passed all the regression tests in >> master branch). I will commit your patch if there's no objection. > > Yeah, thanks, please go ahead.