Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqH8tk=b0m8rFQZJ8E50NxC=0fuBK6nXyuD32Aa1oR+SMQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 8:54 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 6:52 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:11 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> > > On 29/10/2020 15:03, Amit Langote wrote:
> > > > Rebased over the recent executor result relation related commits.
> > >
> > > ModifyTablePath didn't get the memo that a ModifyTable can only have one
> > > subpath after these patches. Attached patch, on top of your v5 patches,
> > > cleans that up.
> >
> > Ah, thought I'd taken care of that, thanks.  Attached v6.
>
> This got slightly broken due to the recent batch insert related
> changes, so here is the rebased version.  I also made a few cosmetic
> changes.

Broken again, so rebased.

-- 
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Can we have a new SQL callable function to get Postmaster PID?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Can we have a new SQL callable function to get Postmaster PID?