On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 12:19 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> I have pushed this finally.
Thanks a lot.
> I made two further changes:
>
> 1. there was no reason to rename ExecCheckPerms_hook, since its
> signature was changing anyway. I reverted it to the original name.
Sure, that makes sense.
> 2. I couldn't find any reason to expose ExecGetRTEPermissionInfo, and
> given that it's a one-line function, I removed it.
>
> Maybe you had a reason to add ExecGetRTEPermissionInfo, thinking about
> external callers; if so please discuss it.
My thinking was that it might be better to have a macro/function that
takes EState, not es_rteperminfos, from the callers. Kind of like how
there is exec_rt_fetch(). Though, that is only a cosmetic
consideration, so I don't want to insist.
> I'll mark this commitfest entry as committed soon; please post the other
> two patches you had in this series in a new thread.
Will do, thanks.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
