Re: SQL/JSON revisited - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: SQL/JSON revisited
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqGJzrUv8-x6umRTqnX8b5NDXpdz1pNB5cg3n_TD3jZ8Qg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL/JSON revisited  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: SQL/JSON revisited
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 10:08 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 08.03.23 22:40, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > These both seem like things not worth holding up progress for, and I
> > think it would be good to get these patches committed as soon as
> > possible. My intention is to commit them (after some grammar
> > adjustments) plus their documentation in the next few days.
>
> If possible, the documentation for each incremental part should be part
> of that patch, not a separate all-in-one patch.

Here's a version that includes documentation of the individual bits in
their own commits.  I've also merged the patch to add the PLAN clause
to JSON_TABLE into the patch that adds JSON_TABLE itself.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2