Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqG6K=YDX_c7+C3T=RQ7NPsJpUnFHagaWaVsV6qArfbGOA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 7:00 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On 2022-Dec-02, Amit Langote wrote:
> > This sounds like a better idea than adding a new AttrMap, so done this
> > way in the attached 0001.
>
> Thanks for doing that!  I have pushed it, but I renamed
> ri_RootToPartitionMap to ri_RootToChildMap and moved it to another spot
> in ResultRelInfo, which allows to simplify the comments.

Thanks.

> > I've also merged into 0002 the delta patch I had posted earlier to add
> > a copy of RTEPermInfos into the flattened permInfos list instead of
> > adding the Query's copy.
>
> Great.  At this point I have no other comments, except that in both
> parse_relation.c and rewriteManip.c you've chosen to add the new
> functions at the bottom of each file, which is seldom a good choice.
> I think in the case of CombineRangeTables it should be the very first
> function in the file, before all the walker-type stuff; and for
> Add/GetRTEPermissionInfo I would suggest that right below
> addRangeTableEntryForENR might be a decent choice (need to fix the .h
> files to match, of course.)

Okay, I've moved the functions and their .h declarations to the places
you suggest.  While at it, I also uncapitalized Add/Get, because
that's how the nearby functions in the header are named.

Thanks again for the review.  The patch looks much better than it did
3 weeks ago.

-- 
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Niyas Sait
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing MaterialPath support in reparameterize_path_by_child