On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:20 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> At Fri, 30 Oct 2020 06:13:53 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote in
> > However, when the same MINUS SIGN in UTF-8 is converted to SJIS
> > encoding, the convert function returns the correct result. See below:
> >
> > postgres=# select convert('\xe28892', 'utf-8', 'sjis');
> > convert
> > ---------
> > \x817c
> > (1 row)
>
> It is manually added by UCS_to_SJIS.pl. I'm not sure about the reason
> but maybe because it was used widely.
>
> So ping-pong between Unicode and SJIS behaves like this:
>
> U+2212 => 0x817c@sjis => U+ff0d => 0x817c@sjis ...
Is it the following piece of code in UCS_TO_SJIS.pl that manually adds
the mapping?
# Add these UTF8->SJIS pairs to the table.
push @$mapping,
...
{
direction => FROM_UNICODE,
ucs => 0x2212,
code => 0x817c,
comment => '# MINUS SIGN',
f => $this_script,
l => __LINE__
},
Given that U+2212 is encoded by e28892 in utf8, I assume that's how
utf8_to_sjis.map ends up with the following mapping into sjis for that
byte sequence:
/*** Three byte table, leaf: e288xx - offset 0x004ee ***/
/* 80 */ 0x81cd, 0x0000, 0x81dd, 0x81ce, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x81de,
/* 88 */ 0x81b8, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x81b9, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000,
/* 90 */ 0x0000, 0x8794, "0x817c", ...
> > Please note that the byte sequence (81-7c) in SJIS represents MINUS
> > SIGN in SJIS which means the MINUS SIGN in UTF8 got converted to the
> > MINUS SIGN in SJIS and that is what we expect. Isn't it?
>
> I think we don't change authoritative mappings, but maybe can add some
> one-way conversions for the convenience.
Maybe UCS_TO_EUC_JP.pl could do something like the above.
Are there other cases that were fixed like this in the past, either
for euc_jp or sjis?
--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
