At Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:38:30 +0900, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote in
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:20 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So ping-pong between Unicode and SJIS behaves like this:
> >
> > U+2212 => 0x817c@sjis => U+ff0d => 0x817c@sjis ...
>
> Is it the following piece of code in UCS_TO_SJIS.pl that manually adds
> the mapping?
Yes.
> # Add these UTF8->SJIS pairs to the table.
> push @$mapping,
> ...
> {
> direction => FROM_UNICODE,
> ucs => 0x2212,
> code => 0x817c,
> comment => '# MINUS SIGN',
> f => $this_script,
> l => __LINE__
> },
>
> Given that U+2212 is encoded by e28892 in utf8, I assume that's how
> utf8_to_sjis.map ends up with the following mapping into sjis for that
> byte sequence:
>
> /*** Three byte table, leaf: e288xx - offset 0x004ee ***/
>
> /* 80 */ 0x81cd, 0x0000, 0x81dd, 0x81ce, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x81de,
> /* 88 */ 0x81b8, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x81b9, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000,
> /* 90 */ 0x0000, 0x8794, "0x817c", ...
I'm not sure how we should construct our won mapping, but the
difference made by we simply moved to JIS0208.TXT based as Ishii-san
suggested the differences in the mapping would be as the follows.
1. The following codes (regions) are not defined in JIS0208.
8ea1 - 8edf (up to 64 characters (I didn't actually counted them.))
ada1 - adfc (up to 92 characters (ditto))
8ff3f3 - 8ff4a8 (up to 182 characters (ditto))
a1c0 ff3c: (ff3c: FULLWIDTH REVERSE SOLIDUS)
8ff4aa ff07: (ff07: FULLWIDTH APOSTROPHE)
2. some individual differences
EUC 0208 932
a1c1 301c ff5e: (301c:WAVE DASH)
a1c2 2016 2225: (2016:DOUBLE_VERTICAL LINE) : (2225:PARALLEL TO)
* a1dd 2212 ff0d: (2212: MINUS_SIGN) : (ff0d: FULLWIDTH HYPHEN-MINUS)
d1f1 a2 ffe0: (00a2: CENT SIGN) : (ffe0: FULLWIDTH CENT SIGN)
d1f2 a3 ffe1: (00a3: PUND SIGN) : (ffe1: FULLWIDTH POUND SIGN)
a2cc ac ffe2: (00ac: NOT SIGN) : (ffe2: FULLWIDTH NOT SIGN)
*1: https://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/OBSOLETE/EASTASIA/JIS/JIS0208.TXT
> > > Please note that the byte sequence (81-7c) in SJIS represents MINUS
> > > SIGN in SJIS which means the MINUS SIGN in UTF8 got converted to the
> > > MINUS SIGN in SJIS and that is what we expect. Isn't it?
> >
> > I think we don't change authoritative mappings, but maybe can add some
> > one-way conversions for the convenience.
>
> Maybe UCS_TO_EUC_JP.pl could do something like the above.
>
> Are there other cases that were fixed like this in the past, either
> for euc_jp or sjis?
Honestly, I don't know how the mapping was decided in 2002, but
removing the regions in 1 would cause confusion. So what we can do in
this area would be chaning some of 2 to 0208 mapping. But arbitrary
mixture of different mapings would cause new problem..
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
