Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ravi Krishna
Subject Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date
Msg-id C47A2DC6-AE2E-4ED1-BF28-41E026D0B40E@comcast.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
List pgsql-general
>
> Generally speaking, I discourage having lots of databases under one PG
> cluster for exactly these kinds of reasons.  PG's individual clusters
> are relatively lightweight, after all.
>

Plus PG does not directly support cross database queries using 3 part name, something
sqlserver excels at.





pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Next
From: Guyren Howe
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment