Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron
Subject Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date
Msg-id ad3ab0c8-1065-a80a-f613-530967f70729@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Tim Clarke <tim.clarke@minerva.info>)
Responses Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
List pgsql-general
On 6/2/20 1:56 PM, Tim Clarke wrote:
> On 02/06/2020 19:43, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>> But require a new port, and Enterprises have Processes that must be followed.
>> Sure they do.  Automate them.
>>
>> :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Stephen
>
> +1 for automation, isoX != slow
It is when FW rules must be manually approved (and they do review them all), 
then the TASK is converted to a CHANGE and that goes before a CAB meeting.

That's all bypassed with SQL Server and Oracle, though.

-- 
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: TALLURI Nareshkumar
Date:
Subject: RE: LOG: could not send data to client: Broken pipe
Next
From: Ravi Krishna
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment