accessing:
i *thought* the advantage of creating any SQL procedure/function was the entity is stored in procedure cache
load time:
Java vs C++ compare here
http://www.idiom.com/~zilla/Computer/javaCbenchmark.html
Martin
______________________________________________
Disclaimer and confidentiality note
Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates to the official business of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential nature and Sender does not endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission.
> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:54:44 -0400
> From: wmoran@collaborativefusion.com
> To: scott.marlowe@gmail.com
> CC: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Oracle and Postgresql
>
> In response to "Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Jonathan Bond-Caron <jbondc@openmv.com> wrote:
> > > For me, "Oracle stored procedures can be encrypted." is a very real and
> > > valuable argument.
> > > It would certainly be a valuable feature in pgsql (in the enterprise space).
> >
> > I don't see how that's any more effective than writing your stored
> > procs in C in postgresql.
>
> Perhaps the fact that the implementation time/effort for a C procedure
> is something on the order of 10x that for a pl/pgsql procedure?
>
> --
> Bill Moran
> Collaborative Fusion Inc.
> http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
>
> wmoran@collaborativefusion.com
> Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
See how Windows Mobile brings your life together—at home, work, or on the go.
See Now
