On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:06:08 -0700
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> > > As long as the disease of "Intellectual property" is running
> > > around, that "I can encrypt my code" will provide some felt
> > > benefit for PHBs....
> >
> > I have to disagree here. Encrypting stored procedures is not just
> > about forcing customers to pay software maintenance.
>
> Please to explain how you imagine this to be so.
>
> > For us, it's about *protecting hard work and intellectual property*.
>
> Yes, and of course nobody else does "hard work" either. Don't you
> mean you're "protecting" this stuff by forcing people to pay for it?
Are we going to start a VI vs Emacs argument too?
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
