On 11-02-10 05:20 AM, Jan Urbański wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:4D53BBD6.7050507@wulczer.org" type="cite"><br /><pre
wrap="">
D'oh, I was thinking about whether it's safe to skip the internal
subxact if you're in an implicit one and somehow I always convinced
myself that since you eventually close the explicit one, it is.
Obviously my testing wasn't enough :( Attaching an updated patch with
improved docs incorporating Steve's fixes, and fixes & tests for not
statring the implicit subxact. That actually makes the patch a bit
smaller ;) OTOH I had to remove the section from the docs that claimed
performance improvement due to only starting the explicit subxact...
</pre></blockquote><br /> This version of the patch looks fine to me and seems to work as expected.<br /><br /><br
/><blockquotecite="mid:4D53BBD6.7050507@wulczer.org" type="cite"><pre wrap="">Cheers,
Jan
</pre> <pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
</pre></blockquote><br />
