On 7 Apr 2013, at 05:14, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Greg Jaskiewicz <gryzman@me.com> wrote:
>> Looking around the code Today, one of my helpful tools detected this dead code.
>> As far as I can see, it is actually unused call to strlen() in formatting.c, float8_to_char().
>
> I poked at this a little and suggest the following somewhat more
> extensive cleanup.
>
> It seems to me that there are a bunch of these functions where len is
> unconditionally initialized in NUM_TOCHAR_prepare and then used there.
> Similarly in NUM_TOCHAR_cleanup. And then there's a chunk of each
> individual function that does it a third time. Rather than use the
> same variable in all three places, I've moved the variable
> declarations to the innermost possible scope. Doing that revealed a
> bunch of other, similar places where we can get rid of strlen() calls.
>
> Does this version seem like a good idea?
Looks more extensive :-)
On the quick glance, without a lot of testing it looks ok.
But the lack of test cases stressing all different cases in that file, makes it impossible to say that there's no
regressions.
Personally I always feel uneasy making extensive changes in complicated code like this, without any integrated test
case(s).
--
GJ
