Re: the big picture for index-only scans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: the big picture for index-only scans
Date
Msg-id BANLkTinmqjbdQo4C0TAUbyLvmVbZ-Gn86A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: the big picture for index-only scans  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> That will be true only if you intentionally ignore the points Greg
> raised.  If the table isn't entirely ALL_VISIBLE, then the choice of
> index will determine the ordering of the actual table probes that occur.
> There could be more or fewer page reads, in a more or less optimal
> order, depending on the index used.

However, note that this wasn't one of the cases I said I was going to
try to optimize in the first go-around anyway.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: the big picture for index-only scans
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: time-delayed standbys