On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> If we need to work around brain-dead isupper() tests, maybe the best
>>> thing is to implement two versions of the loop:
>>>
>>> if (encoding is single byte)
>>> ... loop as it stands ...
>>> else
>>> ... loop without the "else if" part
>
>> That seems like a clear improvement. It's a long way from perfect,
>> but still worthwhile.
>
>> Would we back-patch that? Just do it in master? Wait for 9.2?
>
> It looks to me like a portability bug fix, so I'd say back-patch.
>
> I'll take care of it, unless you're hot to do so?
Nope, have at it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
