On 10 May 2011 09:45, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I think we need to refactor the function into something like:
>
> #define WL_LATCH_SET 1
> #define WL_SOCKET_READABLE 2
> #define WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE 4
> #define WL_TIMEOUT 8
> #define WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH 16
While I agree with the need to not box ourselves into a corner on the
latch interface by making sweeping assumptions, isn't the fact that a
socket became readable or writable strictly an implementation detail?
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
