On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I think it'd be really useful to expose some more data in this area
>> though. One random idea is - remember the time at which a table was
>> first observed to need vacuuming. Clear the timestamp when it gets
>> vacuumed. Then you can do:
>
> As far as I recall that logic, there is no delay between when we know
> that a table needs vacuumed and when we do it. I don't see the point of
> introducing any such delay, either.
Well, if there are more tables that need vacuuming than there are
workers available at any given time, there will be a delay. We
probably don't keep track of that delay at present, but we could.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
