Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I think it'd be really useful to expose some more data in this area
> though. One random idea is - remember the time at which a table was
> first observed to need vacuuming. Clear the timestamp when it gets
> vacuumed. Then you can do:
As far as I recall that logic, there is no delay between when we know
that a table needs vacuumed and when we do it. I don't see the point of
introducing any such delay, either.
regards, tom lane
