On 13 May 2011 16:38, Israel Ben Guilherme Fonseca <israel.bgf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 too. I just asked because its common to get shot at mailists after a
>> little of 'off-topic'.
>
> Well afters tons of tests, using my brand new Wireshark skills (thanks
> Maciek), and I got a very strange result (even stranger than before):
>
> I created a new database for the tests, 1 'Person' table, 2 columns (id,
> name), 7000++ registers.
>
> The traffic difference was:
>
> Java 220861 Bytes
> Python 29014 Bytes
Well, your next step should be compare the two wireshark captures and
see what's being done differently in the two cases.
You can run the JDBC driver with loglevel=2 and it'll tell you what it
is doing, too. But really, if what you care about is what's on the
network, then wireshark is the right tool for that job.
I would be suspicious of your Python measurements, FWIW. 29kB for 7k
rows implies you're only receiving ~4 bytes per row, which seems far
too low.
Oliver
