Well, I'm suspicious too. :)
The logs that I pasted in the previous mail was with debug5, but you mean the client driver itself? I'll give a look.
About the wireshark itself, in the link that I pasted, I put 2 screenshots about the measure, at a gross look at it, You can easily tell that the packages are somewhat different.
The java hava a lot of /D/D/D/D
Maybe it's about this:
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/protocol-error-fields.html2011/5/13 Oliver Jowett
<oliver@opencloud.com>On 13 May 2011 16:38, Israel Ben Guilherme Fonseca <
israel.bgf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 too. I just asked because its common to get shot at mailists after a
>> little of 'off-topic'.
>
> Well afters tons of tests, using my brand new Wireshark skills (thanks
> Maciek), and I got a very strange result (even stranger than before):
>
> I created a new database for the tests, 1 'Person' table, 2 columns (id,
> name), 7000++ registers.
>
> The traffic difference was:
>
> Java 220861 Bytes
> Python 29014 Bytes
see what's being done differently in the two cases.
You can run the JDBC driver with loglevel=2 and it'll tell you what it
is doing, too. But really, if what you care about is what's on the
network, then wireshark is the right tool for that job.
I would be suspicious of your Python measurements, FWIW. 29kB for 7k
rows implies you're only receiving ~4 bytes per row, which seems far
too low.
Oliver
