Re: pglz compression performance, take two - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Dilger
Subject Re: pglz compression performance, take two
Date
Msg-id B1D3105C-D68B-445F-B3DF-E3F41FE79C46@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pglz compression performance, take two  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: pglz compression performance, take two
List pgsql-hackers

> On Jun 28, 2021, at 9:05 AM, Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> Is it worth sharting a static inline function that uses your optimization in other places?

s/sharting/sharing/

> How confident are you that your optimization really helps?

By which I mean, is the optimization worth the extra branch checking if (len >= 16)?  Is the 14% speedup you report
dependenton this extra complexity? 

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: pglz compression performance, take two
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Deparsing rewritten query