Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bossart, Nathan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands
Date
Msg-id AE4EAD7D-6C7D-404C-A95E-032EACE21FD4@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I’ve attached a v4 of the patch.

Changes:
 - Early in vacuum(…), emit an ERROR if any specified columns do not exist.
 - Emit a WARNING and skip any specified tables or columns that disappear before they are actually processed.
 - Small additions to the VACUUM regression test.
 - Rebased with master.

Nathan


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG10 pgindent run