Re: [HACKERS] PG10 pgindent run - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG10 pgindent run
Date
Msg-id 20170517230138.GA13878@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG10 pgindent run  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:00:38PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:39:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > > There we go:
> > >
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=calliphoridae&dt=2017-05-16%2023:16:53&stg=typedefs
> > 
> > Yup, looks good now.  Thanks!
> > 
> > BTW, comparing the typedef list to what I got a few hours ago, I see
> > that "Function" is now a known type name, along with the UWhatever
> > symbols from ICU.  I wonder where that came from?  A quick grep
> > suggests that it's not going to mess anything up too badly, but it
> > sure seems like a poor choice for a globally visible typedef name.
> 
> OK, I assume we are good to go for Wednesday afternoon, UTC.  Thanks for
> the research.

Done.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Server Crashes if try to provide slot_name='none' atthe time of creating subscription.