On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:39:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > There we go:
> > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=calliphoridae&dt=2017-05-16%2023:16:53&stg=typedefs
>
> Yup, looks good now. Thanks!
>
> BTW, comparing the typedef list to what I got a few hours ago, I see
> that "Function" is now a known type name, along with the UWhatever
> symbols from ICU. I wonder where that came from? A quick grep
> suggests that it's not going to mess anything up too badly, but it
> sure seems like a poor choice for a globally visible typedef name.
OK, I assume we are good to go for Wednesday afternoon, UTC. Thanks for
the research.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
