Re: JSON for PG 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Date
Msg-id AB5CF1EC-B8FD-44FB-B67A-3188E70343C0@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jan 19, 2012, at 4:27 PM, Robert Haas wrote:

> I think the real fix for this problem is to introduce an
> infrastructure inside the database that allows us to have different
> columns stored in different encodings.  People use bytea for that
> right now, but that's pretty unfriendly: it would be nice to have a
> better system.  However, I expect that to take a lot of work and break
> a lot of things, and until we do it I don't feel that compelled to
> provide buggy and incomplete support for it under the guise of
> implementing a JSON datatype.

+1 This seems like a reasonable compromise and course of action, especially if someone is interested in taking on
column-levelencodings at some point in the next year or two. 

Best,

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences