On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> This is at least inconsistent and at worst wildly misleading. ISTM
>> we ought to adopt some combination of the following ideas:
>
> I vote for this combination:
>
>> 3. Don't show either pg_temp_nn or pg_toast_temp_nn schemas, not even
>> for the current backend.
>
> and
>
>> With any of 1-3 we could also consider adding a rule that \dn+
>> doesn't hide them.
Or perhaps another option would be to make \dnS display these. Not
sure whether I like that or not.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
