On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> This is at least inconsistent and at worst wildly misleading. ISTM
> we ought to adopt some combination of the following ideas:
I vote for this combination:
> 3. Don't show either pg_temp_nn or pg_toast_temp_nn schemas, not even
> for the current backend.
and
> With any of 1-3 we could also consider adding a rule that \dn+
> doesn't hide them.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
