Re: BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinwz9v6diR2NaHSqNA8tJSS94NrNyYTP-Rp4soZ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken  (Konrad Garus <konrad.garus@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Konrad Garus <konrad.garus@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-geometry.html
>
> I wish it explained what arguments each of the operators accepts, and
> whether any automatic conversions take place (like polygon to box in
> that 8.3 issue).
>
> What happens when I call ?# or ?- on a polygon and point? Two points? Open path?
>
> Some of these are obvious, but others not so much.

Hmm, yeah.  That looks like it could be improved.  It's certainly not
obvious to me what box * point means, for example, even though the
description says scaling/rotation.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Igor Markovic
Date:
Subject: Problem with installation
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5707: Cross compilation for windows is broken