Re: BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken
Date
Msg-id 201103111520.p2BFKbO21332@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Konrad Garus <konrad.garus@gmail.com> wrote:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-geometry.html
> >
> > I wish it explained what arguments each of the operators accepts, and
> > whether any automatic conversions take place (like polygon to box in
> > that 8.3 issue).
> >
> > What happens when I call ?# or ?- on a polygon and point? Two points? Open path?
> >
> > Some of these are obvious, but others not so much.
>
> Hmm, yeah.  That looks like it could be improved.  It's certainly not
> obvious to me what box * point means, for example, even though the
> description says scaling/rotation.

Would someone who uses these features please post changes and I will see
that get into the docs?  Thanks.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5837: PQstatus() fails to report lost connection
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: ecpg preprocessor regression in 9.0