On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 07:24, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Looking at file_parser.c, it seems to be largely taken from copy.c. Wouldn't
> it be better to call those functions, or refactor them so they are callable
> if necessary?
We could export private functions and structs in copy.c,
though details of the implementation should be kept in copy.c.
How about splitting the file_fdw patch into two pieces?
One exports the copy functions from the core, and another
implements file_fdw using the infrastructure.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
