Re: Testing Sandforce SSD - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Testing Sandforce SSD
Date
Msg-id AANLkTine0bsX_dvQgncDn600Vmt4KoUb3vSL3LW9qocB@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Testing Sandforce SSD  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Testing Sandforce SSD  (Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Greg Spiegelberg wrote:
>>
>> Speaking of the layers in-between, has this test been done with the ext3
>> journal on a different device?  Maybe the purpose is wrong for the SSD.  Use
>> the SSD for the ext3 journal and the spindled drives for filesystem?
>
> The main disk bottleneck on PostgreSQL databases are the random seeks for
> reading and writing to the main data blocks.  The journal information is
> practically noise in comparison--it barely matters because it's so much less
> difficult to keep up with.  This is why I don't really find ext2 interesting
> either.

Note that SSDs aren't usually real fast at large sequential writes
though, so it might be worth putting pg_xlog on a spinning pair in a
mirror and seeing how much, if any, the SSD drive speeds up when not
having to do pg_xlog.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing Sandforce SSD
Next
From: Greg Spiegelberg
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing Sandforce SSD