Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gurjeet Singh
Subject Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinZR4D0ZFuGdCvGni=A0g-xN=kODW6s+O2ShGz=@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello

2010/12/7 Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>:
> Your perception has been mirrored on the Oracle free list. Really what
> PostgreSQL people need to come to grips with is whether or not we want
> to make it easier for others to port to Pg or not. (assuming
> reasonableness)
>

it's question if this is task more for EnterpriseDB and less for PostgreSQL?


FWIW, EnterpriseDB Advanced Server has had the SYNONYM feature for quite a while now: http://www.enterprisedb.com/documentation/ddl-synonims.html

Regards,
--
gurjeet.singh
@ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
http://www.EnterpriseDB.com

singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | yahoo }.com
Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet

Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Next
From: Chris Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: Tool for data modeling and ER diagram