On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe. That sounds like a pretty enormous foot-gun to me, considering
> that we have no way of recovering from the situation where the standby
> gets ahead of the master.
No, we can do that by reconstructing the standby from the backup.
And, that situation is not a problem for users including me who prefer to
perform a failover when the master goes down. Of course, we can just restart
the master in that case, but it's likely to take longer than a failover
because there would be a cause of the crash. For example, if the master goes
down because of a media crash, the master would never start up unless PITR
is performed. So I'm not sure how many users prefer a restart to a failover.
> We should get the open item fixed for 9.0 here before we start
> worrying about 9.1.
Yep, so I was submitting some patches in these days :)
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
