On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Maybe. That sounds like a pretty enormous foot-gun to me, considering
>> that we have no way of recovering from the situation where the standby
>> gets ahead of the master.
>
> No, we can do that by reconstructing the standby from the backup.
>
> And, that situation is not a problem for users including me who prefer to
> perform a failover when the master goes down.
You don't get to pick - if a backend crashes on the master, it will
restart right away and come up, but the slave will now be hosed...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
