On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 20:37, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 20:32, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> Something in the rsync process thinks that ignoring subdirectories
>>> named "core" is a good idea. I'm a bit surprised nobody ever noticed
>>> these were missing from anoncvs before ...
>>
>> That's because they aren't. It's the -C switch in your rsync call
>> that's at fault. (And this demonstrates why comparing against checkouts
>> from the same CVS repo isn't an end-to-end test :-()
>
> Yeah, I noticed that too. Re-running now.
Ok, re-run off a correct rsync pushed. How does it look now?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
