On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 20:32, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Something in the rsync process thinks that ignoring subdirectories
>> named "core" is a good idea. I'm a bit surprised nobody ever noticed
>> these were missing from anoncvs before ...
>
> That's because they aren't. It's the -C switch in your rsync call
> that's at fault. (And this demonstrates why comparing against checkouts
> from the same CVS repo isn't an end-to-end test :-()
Yeah, I noticed that too. Re-running now.
FWIW, I got thecommand off the wiki's recommendations for how to use rsync....
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
