On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> wrote:
> On 11/02/11 16:47, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 02:09, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> wrote:
>>> It seems a bit heavy handed to invalidate and remake the entire
>>> plpython function whenever we hit this case. I think we could get away
>>> with setting ->is_rowtype = 2 in PLy_procedure_valid() instead. I
>>> suppose it should be fairly rare case anyway so... *shrug*.
>>
>> This last comment might make me think that we're looking for a new
>> version of this patch, but the comment on the CommitFest application
>> says "looks good". So I'm not sure whether this should be marked
>> Waiting on Author or Ready for Committer, but the current status of
>> Needs Review looks wrong.
>
> I'm not planning on writing a new version of the patch. AIUI Alex said,
> that there's a possible optimization to be done, but the gain is so
> small that it doesn't matter.
OK, marked Ready for Committer.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
