* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Kevin Grittner
> > Should we abbreviate something there? max_pred_locks_per_tran,
> > maybe?
>
> If we're going to abbreviate transaction, I'd vote for txn over tran,
> but I think Stephen's point that this is already a lost cause may have
> some validity. Not sure what other people think.
There's lots of other GUCs with "transaction" spelled out in them.. :/
Another option, which I don't like, would be to use 'default' by
'default', and build the list on the fly every time if that's what it
is.. That would give no insight into what the list of fields is for
someone though, they'd have to go back to the documentation to figure
it out, and that sucks..
Thanks,
Stephen
