Re: Stange IO error while working with large objects. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dmitriy Igrishin
Subject Re: Stange IO error while working with large objects.
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinE1BsyZvzupmUOpNar_TkJsdBSqsuE6dQ0qQAA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Stange IO error while working with large objects.  (Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Stange IO error while working with large objects.  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
I've checked the disk with badblocs(8). The results are:

File /pgsql/9.0/data0/base/16386/11838.5 (inode #3015588, mod time Wed Mar 30 13:13:13 2011)
  has 50 multiply-claimed block(s), shared with 1 file(s):
    <The bad blocks inode> (inode #1, mod time Wed Mar 30 15:23:19 2011)

After this, I've dropped the database and create a new one. Problem is solved.
All the same it is interesting, why there was such problem? I am disturbed because
I intend to use large objects in production...

Suggestions ?

2011/3/30 Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com>
Hey all,

I've never experienced such problems before pefrorming some tests
on large objects. I am on Ubuntu and my HDD is whole encrypted
(LVM2). I've imported large object ~ 1.5 Gb of size. After this, entire
system lost performance dramaticaly and the disk activity becomes
anomalous.

After reboot everithing is fine with OS, but attempt to remove all
large object results in error:

dmitigr=# select lo_unlink(loid) from (select distinct loid from pg_largeobject) as foo;
ERROR:  could not read block 704833 in file "base/16386/11838.5": read only 4096 of 8192 bytes

What does this means -- hardware / OS / Postgres failure ?

Any suggestions ? 

--
// Dmitriy.





--
// Dmitriy.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Koichi Suzuki
Date:
Subject: Re: Is pglesslog stable for use in 9.0?
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Stange IO error while working with large objects.