Re: Extensions, this time with a patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Itagaki Takahiro
Subject Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Date
Msg-id AANLkTin0H3g=3LeJQo0soKiXt+r-tZtuRgZeyW1erUuv@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions, this time with a patch  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:14 AM, David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> wrote:
> Might I suggest instead a META.json file like PGXN requires?

I think JSON is also reasonable, but one of the problem to use JSON format is
we cannot apply the extension patch until JSON patch has been applied ;-)

BTW, does anyone needs JSON formatted configuration files for other purposes?
There might be some discussions in "Standby registration" or "Configuring
synchronous replication" threads. Module control files are so simple that
they don't always require JSON format, such as nested variable. But
configuration files for replication might be more complex. If needed,
it would be reasonable to introduce a JSON reader.

-- 
Itagaki Takahiro


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: lazy snapshots?