Re: pg_upgrade docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_upgrade docs
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikriYF0gD-qME25Ync6utLX0IGbntyqtE2oB8LU@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade docs  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade docs
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>> > I have updated the paragraph to be:
>> >
>> >     Upgrading from PostgreSQL 8.3 has additional restrictions not present
>> >     when upgrading from later PostgreSQL releases.  For example,
>> >     pg_upgrade will not work for a migration from 8.3 if a user column
>> >     is defined as:
>> >
>> > Can you suggest other wording?
>>
>> hmm that seems better thanks, however I just noticed that we don't have
>> a "general limitations" section. The way the docs are now done suggests
>> that there are not limitations at all (except for the two warnings in
>> the migration guide). Is pg_upgrade really up to the point where it can
>> fully replace pg_dump & pg_restore independent of the loaded (contrib)
>> or even third party modules(like postgis or custom datatypes etc)?
>
> Yea, that's about right.  I can add limiations if you want.  ;-)

I don't believe this.  For one thing, I am pretty sure that if there
are ABI differences between loadable modules between the old and new
cluster, hilarity will ensue.

> The only open pg_upgrade items are the ones on our TODO list:
>
>        http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo
>
> (I can't give you a URL hash-reference to the section because it doesn't
> work on Firefox and no one seems to be able to fix it.)

It works OK for me.  The link to /contrib/pg_upgrade within the nav
section at the top righthand corner of the page seems to work just
fine.

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#.2Fcontrib.2Fpg_upgrade

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dan Ports
Date:
Subject: Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h