Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h
Date
Msg-id 201005242111.32622.meskes@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h
List pgsql-hackers
> I think the current coding is extremely fragile (if it indeed works at
> all) because of its assumption that <limits.h> has been included

Well, this is the case in the code so far.

> already.  In any case, we have configure tests that exist only for the
> benefit of contrib modules, so it's hard to argue that we shouldn't have
> one that exists only for ecpg.
>
> I think we should fix this (properly) for 9.0.

Ok, I don't mind fixing it properly for 9.0. Will do so as soon as I find time.

Michael

--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber meskes@jabber.org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade docs
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h