2011/2/26 Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>:
> ----- Original message -----
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>
>> wrote:
>> > On 15/02/11 20:39, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > > On tis, 2011-02-15 at 09:58 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
>> > > > [a bug that we don't know how to fix]
>
>> From this discussion I gather that we have a problem here that we
>> don't exactly know how to fix, so I'm inclined to suggest that we mark
>> this Returned with Feedback in the CommitFest and instead add it to
>> the TODO. Since this is a pre-existing bug and not a new regression,
>> it should not be something we hold up beta for.
>
> I'm officially at a loss on how to fix that bug without some serious gutting of how PL/Python arguments work. If
someonecomes up with a brilliant way to solve this problem, we can commit it after beta, or even during the 9.2 cycle
(shouldthe brilliant solution be backpatcheable).
Is this discussion related to the following todo item:
Create a new restricted execution class that will allow passing
function arguments in as locals. Passing them as globals means
functions cannot be called recursively.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
