> > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 15/02/11 20:39, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > > On tis, 2011-02-15 at 09:58 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
> > > > > > [a bug that we don't know how to fix]
> >
> > > From this discussion I gather that we have a problem here that we
> > > don't exactly know how to fix, so I'm inclined to suggest that we
> > > mark this Returned with Feedback in the CommitFest and instead add
> > > it to the TODO. Since this is a pre-existing bug and not a new
> > > regression, it should not be something we hold up beta for.
> >
> > I'm officially at a loss on how to fix that bug without some serious
> > gutting of how PL/Python arguments work. If someone comes up with a
> > brilliant way to solve this problem, we can commit it after beta, or
> > even during the 9.2 cycle (should the brilliant solution be
> > backpatcheable).
>
> Is this discussion related to the following todo item:
>
> Create a new restricted execution class that will allow passing
> function arguments in as locals. Passing them as globals means
> functions cannot be called recursively.
Yep, the bug it's more or less an emanation of this problem.
