On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Any objections to me committing this?
>>>
>>> Might wanna fix this first:
>>>
>>> +PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(ssl_veresion);
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>> Wow. It works remarkably well without fixing that, but I'll admit
>> that does seem lucky.
>
> Well, it's got no arguments, which is the main thing that works
> differently in call protocol V1. I think you'd find that the
> PG_RETURN_NULL case doesn't really work though ...
It seems to work, but it might be that something's broken under the hood.
Anyhow, committed with that correction.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
