On 8 February 2011 09:22, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 20:38, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>> Yes, of course, int8 functions are separate. I attach an updated
>> patch, although I still think there's a better way of doing this.
>
> Thanks. Please add the patch to the *current* commitfest
> because it's a bugfix.
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=9
>
> I've not tested the patch yet, but if we could drop the following
> line in the patch, the code could be much cleaner.
> /* ensure first value in series should exist */
>
>> I'm not sure how this should be handled. Should there just be a check
>> for either kind of infinity and return an error if that's the case? I
>
> Maybe so. It also works if we had infinity on timestamp overflow, but
> I've not tested yet. Anyway, we need similar fix for timestamp versions.
Well, in its current state, I expect it to get rejected, but I guess
at least it gets a better chance of being looked at. I've added it to
the commitfest now.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
