On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> Now, what about having the control file host an 'upgrade' property where
> to put the script name? We would have to support a way for this filename
> to depend on the already installed version, I'm thinking that %v might
> be the easiest here (read: I want to avoid depending on any version
> scheme).
>
> version = '13'
> script = 'foo.sql'
> upgrade = 'foo_upgrade.%v.13.sql'
If I was linking of putting bundling my "utiliites" up as an extension
(yes, I would that from a packaging/DB management perspective), I
think I'ld like a control like that, but with a bit of a "wildcard"
version matching, something like:
version = '3.12' upgrade-1. = 'utils-upgrade-1.0.sql' upgrade-2. = 'utils-upgrade-2..0.sql upgrade-3. = 'nothing'
I'm thinking of a scheme where the upgrade-$VERSION uses a prefix
match, so 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 would all be matched by "1.". The 3.=nothing
is some way of specifing you don't need to do anything, becuase my n.X
release are all compatible sql->so wise. They would only be "bug
fixes" if I did something wrong in my stuff.. Anything not compatible
woudl bump the first number.
If it's a "prefix" type match, then the PG versionins woudl work too,
for intsance: upgrade-9.0.=...
would match any pg 9.0.*
I guess you could use SQL like if that' more "consitent"...
a.
--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
aidan@highrise.ca command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
