Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE; - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;
Date
Msg-id m2d3p91e6l.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> The alternative would be to match postgresql minor version numbering
> exactly, and then come up with some way to have a "no-op" upgrade in the
> frequent cases where the contrib module isn't changed during a minor
> release.  This would also require some kind of "upgrade all" command for
> contrib.

That's as easy as having non-continuous version numbering. In your
example, we get from dblink version 9.1.0 to 9.1.4, but the 3 releases
before that it remains dblink 9.1.0.

Would it cut it?
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;
Next
From: Aidan Van Dyk
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;